AFSM vs VOO
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AFSM or VOO?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AFSM led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AFSM is less concentrated, with 8.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AFSM | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $137M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 670 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +23.12%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | +24.70%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.76% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.75% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 16.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.5% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,923 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.2%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 4, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (6.8 years).
AFSM vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.
AFSM vs VOO Performance
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AFSM returned +24.70% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, AFSM is up 23.12% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, AFSM compounded at +18.76% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.75% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.69% annualized vs +11.71%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AFSM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 16.9% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.5% for AFSM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AFSM charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFSM currently yields 0.50% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
1.0% of AFSM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.2% of VOO's money is in holdings AFSM also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 333 positions we hold weights for in AFSM and 504 in VOO, against full books of 670 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for AFSM (99.1% of the fund), and 311 for AFSM that do not appear in VOO (91.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AFSM and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AFSM or VOO?
AFSM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AFSM or VOO?
Over the past year AFSM returned +24.70% vs +20.08% for VOO, so AFSM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AFSM annualized +11.71% vs +15.69% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AFSM or VOO?
AFSM has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 16.9% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AFSM -43.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AFSM and VOO?
AFSM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AFSM or VOO?
AFSM yields 0.50% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than AFSM?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. AFSM led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. AFSM is less concentrated, with 8.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.