AFSM vs SCHD
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, AFSM or SCHD?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. AFSM led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. AFSM is less concentrated, with 8.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AFSM | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $137M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 670 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +23.12% | +27.56%Best |
| 1Y Return | +24.70% | +30.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.76%Best | +16.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.75% | +10.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 16.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.5% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,923 | $16,274Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.2%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2019 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 4, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (6.8 years).
AFSM vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.
AFSM vs SCHD Performance
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF (AFSM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year AFSM returned +24.70% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, AFSM is up 23.12% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.
Over three years, AFSM compounded at +18.76% per year against +16.37% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.75% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +12.62% annualized vs +11.71%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AFSM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 16.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.5% for AFSM and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AFSM charges 0.75% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $6 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFSM currently yields 0.50% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
3.0% of AFSM's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 0.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings AFSM also owns.
AFSM and SCHD share little of their money.
12 positions in common, counted across the 333 positions we hold weights for in AFSM and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 670 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 87 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for AFSM (99.0% of the fund), and 302 for AFSM that do not appear in SCHD (89.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AFSM | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRCE1St Source Corp_None_0 | 0.60% | 0.04% | 0.56% |
| MMacy'S Inc. | 0.43% | 0.17% | 0.26% |
| THFFFirst Financial Corporation | 0.52% | 0.02% | 0.50% |
| OFG:PROfg Bancorp Common Stock | 0.26% | 0.06% | 0.20% |
| FHIFederated Investors Inc | 0.19% | 0.11% | 0.08% |
| STBAS&T Bancorp Inc | 0.23% | 0.05% | 0.18% |
| CHCOCity Holding Co Common Stock Usd2.5 | 0.19% | 0.05% | 0.14% |
| VRTSVirtus Investment Partners Inc | 0.20% | 0.03% | 0.17% |
| EBFEnnis Inc | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.20% |
| KFYKorn Ferry | 0.05% | 0.11% | 0.06% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AFSM and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AFSM or SCHD?
AFSM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AFSM or SCHD?
Over the past year AFSM returned +24.70% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AFSM annualized +11.71% vs +12.62% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AFSM or SCHD?
AFSM has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 16.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: AFSM -43.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both AFSM and SCHD?
AFSM and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AFSM and SCHD?
3.0% of AFSM's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 0.7% of SCHD's is in holdings AFSM also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 333 positions we hold weights for in AFSM and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, AFSM or SCHD?
AFSM yields 0.50% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than AFSM?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. AFSM led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. AFSM is less concentrated, with 8.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.