AGMI vs VTI
Themes Silver Miners ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AGMI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGMI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $12M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.77% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.70% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +102.96% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 3, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
AGMI vs VTI Performance
Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGMI returned +102.96% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, AGMI is up 18.70% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for AGMI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGMI charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGMI currently yields 4.77% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AGMI and VTI share 3 holdings out of 2821 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGMI or VTI?
AGMI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AGMI or VTI?
Over the past year AGMI returned +102.96% vs +22.17% for VTI, so AGMI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AGMI annualized +67.88% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AGMI or VTI?
AGMI has been the more volatile fund at 43.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AGMI -35.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AGMI and VTI?
AGMI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AGMI and VTI?
AGMI and VTI share 3 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2821 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGMI or VTI?
AGMI yields 4.77% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AGMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.