AGMI vs VTI
Themes Silver Miners ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AGMI or VTI?
AGMI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AGMI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AGMI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.69% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 47 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +7.93% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +34.25%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.9% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $29,649Best | $15,329 |
| Top 10 Weight | 64.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 3, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 3, 2024 to Oct 2, 2026 (2.4 years).
AGMI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
AGMI vs VTI Performance
Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) is an ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AGMI returned +34.25% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, AGMI is up 7.93% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AGMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.9% compared with 11.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for AGMI and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AGMI charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AGMI currently yields 3.69% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
18.9% of AGMI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.3% of VTI's money is in holdings AGMI also owns.
AGMI and VTI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, AGMI as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in AGMI and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 47 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,146 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for AGMI (97.2% of the fund), and 4 for AGMI that do not appear in VTI (7.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AGMI and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AGMI or VTI?
AGMI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AGMI or VTI?
Over the past year AGMI returned +34.25% vs +15.92% for VTI, so AGMI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AGMI annualized +57.28% vs +19.48% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AGMI or VTI?
AGMI has been the more volatile fund at 43.9% annualized versus 11.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AGMI -35.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both AGMI and VTI?
AGMI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AGMI and VTI?
18.9% of AGMI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.3% of VTI's is in holdings AGMI also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in AGMI and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, AGMI or VTI?
AGMI yields 3.69% while VTI yields 1.03%, so AGMI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AGMI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AGMI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.