AIEQ vs HUMM
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF vs 800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, AIEQ or HUMM?
HUMM costs less.
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIEQ | HUMM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $108M | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 329 | 66 |
| YTD Return | +7.98%Best | -10.49% |
| 1Y Return | +7.91% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.15% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.82% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.5%Best | 49.5% |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2017 | Sep 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AIEQ vs HUMM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AIEQ vs HUMM Performance
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and 800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF (HUMM) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, AIEQ is up 7.98% versus a loss of 10.49% for HUMM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while HUMM charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $49 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.40% against 0.00% for HUMM.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of AIEQ's money is in holdings HUMM also owns. 5.5% of HUMM's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.
HUMM and AIEQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 161 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 24 in HUMM, against full books of 329 and 66.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for HUMM that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (56.5% of the fund), and 159 for AIEQ that do not appear in HUMM (99.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIEQ | Weight in HUMM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.05% | 5.52% | 5.47% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AIEQ and HUMM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIEQ or HUMM?
AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while HUMM charges 0.49%. HUMM is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and HUMM?
5.5% of HUMM's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns. 5.5% of HUMM's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 161 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 24 in HUMM.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or HUMM?
AIEQ yields 0.40% while HUMM yields 0.00%, so AIEQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HUMM better than AIEQ?
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. AIEQ is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.