AIEQ vs VYM
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, AIEQ or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIEQ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $121M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 324 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +10.69% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.49% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.92% | +18.12%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.06% | +12.17%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.0% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.0% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,202 | $17,758Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 18, 2017 to Sep 11, 2026 (8.9 years).
AIEQ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
AIEQ vs VYM Performance
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AIEQ returned +12.49% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, AIEQ is up 10.69% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Over three years, AIEQ compounded at +17.92% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +4.06% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.88% annualized vs +9.74%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 15.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.0% for AIEQ and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIEQ charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIEQ currently yields 0.38% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
41.2% of AIEQ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 35.6% of VYM's money is in holdings AIEQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
84 positions in common, counted across the 161 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 603 in VYM, against full books of 324 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 485 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for AIEQ (62.0% of the fund), and 77 for AIEQ that do not appear in VYM (58.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AIEQ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELTE Connectivity PLC Common Stock | 11.54% | 0.24% | 11.30% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.13% | 7.29% | 5.16% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.26% | 1.42% | 0.16% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 0.05% | 2.54% | 2.49% |
| CMECme Group Inc. | 2.21% | 0.33% | 1.88% |
| APOApollo Global Management Inc | 2.28% | 0.21% | 2.07% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.05% | 2.36% | 2.31% |
| EDConsolidated Edison Inc. | 2.23% | 0.17% | 2.06% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 1.40% | 0.97% | 0.43% |
| VLOValero Energy Corp. | 1.99% | 0.32% | 1.67% |
41.2% of AIEQ is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIEQ or VYM?
AIEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AIEQ or VYM?
Over the past year AIEQ returned +12.49% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), AIEQ annualized +9.74% vs +9.88% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AIEQ or VYM?
AIEQ has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 15.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AIEQ -39.0% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both AIEQ and VYM?
AIEQ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AIEQ and VYM?
41.2% of AIEQ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 35.6% of VYM's is in holdings AIEQ also owns. They hold 84 positions in common, counted across the 161 positions we hold weights for in AIEQ and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIEQ or VYM?
AIEQ yields 0.38% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than AIEQ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.