AIVC vs VXUS
Amplify Bloomberg AI Equal Weight ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. AIVC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIVC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $134M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +67.37% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +105.94% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +48.83% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.04% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
AIVC vs VXUS Performance
Amplify Bloomberg AI Equal Weight ETF (AIVC) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AIVC returned +105.94% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, AIVC is up 67.37% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, AIVC compounded at +48.83% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +18.04% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, AIVC has the edge at +16.17% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIVC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.1% for AIVC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIVC charges 0.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $5 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIVC currently yields 0.11% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
AIVC and VXUS share 8 holdings out of 7907 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIVC or VXUS?
AIVC has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AIVC or VXUS?
Over the past year AIVC returned +105.94% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so AIVC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), AIVC annualized +16.17% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AIVC or VXUS?
AIVC has been the more volatile fund at 25.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: AIVC -56.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both AIVC and VXUS?
AIVC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AIVC and VXUS?
AIVC and VXUS share 8 common holdings with a 5.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7907 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIVC or VXUS?
AIVC yields 0.11% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.