AIVC vs VTI
Amplify Bloomberg AI Equal Weight ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AIVC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AIVC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $134M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +59.57% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +103.28% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +46.84% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.66% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 8, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
AIVC vs VTI Performance
Amplify Bloomberg AI Equal Weight ETF (AIVC) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AIVC returned +103.28% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, AIVC is up 59.57% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, AIVC compounded at +46.84% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +16.66% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, AIVC has the edge at +15.61% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AIVC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.1% for AIVC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AIVC charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AIVC currently yields 0.11% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AIVC and VTI share 31 holdings out of 2802 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AIVC or VTI?
AIVC has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AIVC or VTI?
Over the past year AIVC returned +103.28% vs +22.35% for VTI, so AIVC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), AIVC annualized +15.61% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AIVC or VTI?
AIVC has been the more volatile fund at 25.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AIVC -56.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AIVC and VTI?
AIVC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AIVC and VTI?
AIVC and VTI share 31 common holdings with a 21.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2802 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AIVC or VTI?
AIVC yields 0.11% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.