AMMO vs VYM
VistaShares Defense Supercycle ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, AMMO or VYM?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMMO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 54 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +3.05% | +14.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.4% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 15, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AMMO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AMMO vs VYM Performance
VistaShares Defense Supercycle ETF (AMMO) is an ETF from VistaShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, AMMO is up 3.05% versus a gain of 14.33% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMMO charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMMO currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
2.5% of AMMO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.2% of VYM's money is in holdings AMMO also owns.
AMMO and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, AMMO as of Aug 19, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in AMMO and 602 in VYM, against full books of 54 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 568 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for AMMO (97.0% of the fund), and 25 for AMMO that do not appear in VYM (44.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMMO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 2.52% | 0.22% | 2.30% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMMO and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMMO or VYM?
AMMO has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AMMO and VYM?
2.5% of AMMO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.2% of VYM's is in holdings AMMO also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in AMMO and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMMO or VYM?
AMMO yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than AMMO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.