AMMO vs IVV
VistaShares Defense Supercycle ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AMMO or IVV?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AMMO is less concentrated, with 32.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMMO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 54 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -0.71% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.69% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.61% |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.4%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 15, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
AMMO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
AMMO vs IVV Performance
VistaShares Defense Supercycle ETF (AMMO) is an ETF from VistaShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, AMMO is down 0.71% versus a gain of 12.98% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMMO charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMMO currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
12.6% of AMMO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.1% of IVV's money is in holdings AMMO also owns.
AMMO and IVV share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in AMMO and 490 in IVV, against full books of 54 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 476 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AMMO (97.5% of the fund), and 20 for AMMO that do not appear in IVV (32.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMMO and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMMO or IVV?
AMMO has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between AMMO and IVV?
12.6% of AMMO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.1% of IVV's is in holdings AMMO also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in AMMO and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMMO or IVV?
AMMO yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AMMO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AMMO is less concentrated, with 32.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.