AMUU vs IVV
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AMUU delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMUU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $88M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.48% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +192.83% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +346.35% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 211.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
AMUU vs IVV Performance
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X ETF (AMUU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AMUU returned +346.35% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, AMUU is up 192.83% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMUU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 211.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for AMUU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMUU charges 1.06% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $3 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMUU currently yields 4.48% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AMUU and IVV share 1 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMUU | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD | 12.72% | 1.37% | 11.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMUU or IVV?
AMUU has an expense ratio of 1.06% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMUU or IVV?
Over the past year AMUU returned +346.35% vs +20.94% for IVV, so AMUU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AMUU annualized +287.84% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMUU or IVV?
AMUU has been the more volatile fund at 211.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AMUU -56.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AMUU and IVV?
AMUU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMUU and IVV?
AMUU and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMUU or IVV?
AMUU yields 4.48% while IVV yields 1.10%, so AMUU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.