AMUU vs VTI
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AMUU delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMUU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $88M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.48% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +192.83% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +346.35% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 211.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
AMUU vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X ETF (AMUU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMUU returned +346.35% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, AMUU is up 192.83% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMUU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 211.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for AMUU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMUU charges 1.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $106 vs $3 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMUU currently yields 4.48% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AMUU and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AMUU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMD | 12.72% | 1.30% | 11.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMUU or VTI?
AMUU has an expense ratio of 1.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMUU or VTI?
Over the past year AMUU returned +346.35% vs +21.39% for VTI, so AMUU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AMUU annualized +287.84% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMUU or VTI?
AMUU has been the more volatile fund at 211.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMUU -56.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AMUU and VTI?
AMUU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMUU and VTI?
AMUU and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMUU or VTI?
AMUU yields 4.48% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AMUU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.