AMZD vs VTI
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AMZD or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.56, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $19M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.65% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -12.24% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.12% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -19.94% | +20.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.0% | 13.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -74.8% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 4 years | $4,365 | $19,460Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 8, 2022 to Sep 16, 2026 (4 years).
AMZD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.
AMZD vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF (AMZD) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMZD returned -10.12% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, AMZD is down 12.24% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Over three years, AMZD compounded at -19.94% per year against +20.48% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +18.11% annualized vs -18.72%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.0% compared with 13.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.8% for AMZD and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.56. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZD charges 1.02% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZD currently yields 3.65% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3 holdings in AMZD and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 96.6% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in AMZD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 6 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AMZD and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZD or VTI?
AMZD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $99 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AMZD or VTI?
Over the past year AMZD returned -10.12% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AMZD annualized -18.72% vs +18.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AMZD or VTI?
AMZD has been the more volatile fund at 29.0% annualized versus 13.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMZD -74.8% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both AMZD and VTI?
AMZD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.56, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZD or VTI?
AMZD yields 3.65% while VTI yields 1.03%, so AMZD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AMZD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.56, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.