AMZD vs VTI
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $13M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.23% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -17.68% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | -16.72% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -21.98% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -74.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
AMZD vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF (AMZD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMZD returned -16.72% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, AMZD is down 17.68% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, AMZD compounded at -21.98% per year against +21.93% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -20.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.8% for AMZD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZD charges 1.02% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZD currently yields 3.23% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
AMZD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZD or VTI?
AMZD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMZD or VTI?
Over the past year AMZD returned -16.72% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AMZD annualized -20.41% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMZD or VTI?
AMZD has been the more volatile fund at 29.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AMZD -74.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both AMZD and VTI?
AMZD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMZD and VTI?
AMZD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZD or VTI?
AMZD yields 3.23% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AMZD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.