AMZD vs VXUS
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZD | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $12M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.26% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -21.32% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -23.18% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -22.73% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -74.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
AMZD vs VXUS Performance
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF (AMZD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMZD returned -23.18% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, AMZD is down 21.32% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, AMZD compounded at -22.73% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -21.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.8% for AMZD and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZD charges 1.02% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $5 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZD currently yields 3.26% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
AMZD and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7864 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZD or VXUS?
AMZD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMZD or VXUS?
Over the past year AMZD returned -23.18% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AMZD annualized -21.41% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMZD or VXUS?
AMZD has been the more volatile fund at 28.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: AMZD -74.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both AMZD and VXUS?
AMZD and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMZD and VXUS?
AMZD and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7864 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZD or VXUS?
AMZD yields 3.26% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so AMZD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.