AMZD vs VOO
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMZD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $12M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.26% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -18.52% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | -19.95% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -21.72% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.0% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -74.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AMZD vs VOO Performance
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF (AMZD) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AMZD returned -19.95% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, AMZD is down 18.52% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, AMZD compounded at -21.72% per year against +21.80% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs -20.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AMZD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.0% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.8% for AMZD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AMZD charges 1.02% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AMZD currently yields 3.26% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AMZD and VOO share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AMZD or VOO?
AMZD has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AMZD or VOO?
Over the past year AMZD returned -19.95% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AMZD annualized -20.63% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AMZD or VOO?
AMZD has been the more volatile fund at 29.0% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: AMZD -74.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AMZD and VOO?
AMZD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AMZD and VOO?
AMZD and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AMZD or VOO?
AMZD yields 3.26% while VOO yields 1.09%, so AMZD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.