ANV vs QQQ
GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANV | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $4M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.92% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.08% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ANV vs QQQ Performance
GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF (ANV) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ANV is up 11.08% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.8% for ANV and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANV charges 1.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $18 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANV currently yields 6.92% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANV or QQQ?
ANV has an expense ratio of 1.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANV or QQQ?
ANV yields 6.92% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ANV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.