ANV vs VYM
GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ANV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.54% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +10.91% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ANV vs VYM Performance
GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF (ANV) is a ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, ANV is up 10.91% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.8% for ANV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ANV charges 1.07% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $4 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ANV currently yields 5.54% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ANV or VYM?
ANV has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, ANV or VYM?
ANV yields 5.54% while VYM yields 2.86%, so ANV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.