AOCT vs OVL

AOCT vs OVL

Which is better, AOCT or OVL?

Each has led over a different period.

AOCT led over 1Y, OVL over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAOCTOVL
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$70M$513M
Dividend Yield0.00%9.46%
Holdings1323
YTD Return+4.93%Best+3.86%
1Y Return+5.93%Best+3.48%
3Y Return (annualized)-+19.62%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.87%
Volatility (annualized)2.5%Best13.8%
Max Drawdown-3.7%Best-21.7%
$10,000 over 2.1 years$11,199$12,540Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustOverlay Shares
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 2, 2024Sep 30, 2019

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 1, 2024 to Nov 11, 2026 (2.1 years).

AOCT vs OVL growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.

Compare AOCT against instead:AOCT vs SPYAOCT vs QQQAOCT vs VOOAOCT vs VTIOVL against:OVL vs VXUS

AOCT vs OVL Performance

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2028 (AOCT) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) is an ETF from Overlay Shares. Over the past year AOCT returned +5.93% while OVL returned +3.48%. Year to date, AOCT is up 4.93% versus a gain of 3.86% for OVL.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

OVL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.8% compared with 2.5% for AOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.7% for AOCT and -21.7% for OVL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AOCT charges 0.79% per year while OVL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, AOCT currently yields 0.00% against 9.46% for OVL.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of AOCT and OVL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

AOCTOVL

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AOCT or OVL?

AOCT has an expense ratio of 0.79% while OVL charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, AOCT or OVL?

Over the past year AOCT returned +5.93% vs +3.48% for OVL, so AOCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AOCT annualized +5.54% vs +11.38% for OVL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, AOCT or OVL?

OVL has been the more volatile fund at 13.8% annualized versus 2.5% for AOCT. Worst drawdown: AOCT -3.7% vs OVL -21.7%.

Should I hold both AOCT and OVL?

AOCT and OVL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, AOCT or OVL?

AOCT yields 0.00% while OVL yields 9.46%, so OVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is OVL better than AOCT?

AOCT led over 1Y, OVL over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.