AOCT vs IVV
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2026 vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOCT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $49M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +3.77% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.15% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 2, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
AOCT vs IVV Performance
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2026 (AOCT) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AOCT returned +6.15% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, AOCT is up 3.77% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.6% for AOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.7% for AOCT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOCT charges 0.79% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOCT currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOCT or IVV?
AOCT has an expense ratio of 0.79% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOCT or IVV?
Over the past year AOCT returned +6.15% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), AOCT annualized +5.60% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOCT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.6% for AOCT. Worst drawdown: AOCT -3.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AOCT and IVV?
AOCT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOCT or IVV?
AOCT yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.