APHG vs VTI
Leverage Shares 2X Long APH Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | APHG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $385,498.17 | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +3.45% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.45% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1025668.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
APHG vs VTI Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long APH Daily ETF (APHG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year APHG returned +3.45% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, APHG is up 3.45% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
APHG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 1025668.4% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.1% for APHG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.06. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
APHG charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APHG currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
APHG and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, APHG or VTI?
APHG has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, APHG or VTI?
Over the past year APHG returned +3.45% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), APHG annualized +55.95% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, APHG or VTI?
APHG has been the more volatile fund at 1025668.4% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: APHG -94.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both APHG and VTI?
APHG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.06, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between APHG and VTI?
APHG and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, APHG or VTI?
APHG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.