APHG vs VOO

APHG vs VOO

Which is better, APHG or VOO?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. APHG led over the full window, VOO over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAPHGVOO
Expense Ratio0.99%0.03%Best
AUM$296,272.14$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings4509
YTD Return-13.16%+11.01%Best
1Y Return-13.16%+15.60%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.82%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.60%
Volatility (annualized)-14.1%
Max Drawdown-94.1%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 16 years$139,911,530Best$73,736
Fund FamilyLeverage SharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 16, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 16 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 27, 2010 to Sep 16, 2026 (16 years).

APHG vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

APHG vs VOO Performance

Leverage Shares 2X Long APH Daily ETF (APHG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year APHG returned -13.16% while VOO returned +15.60%. Year to date, APHG is down 13.16% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.1% for APHG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

Fees and Cost Over Time

APHG charges 0.99% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APHG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in APHG and 494 in VOO, totalling 19.3% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in APHG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 4 and 509.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of APHG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

APHGVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, APHG or VOO?

APHG has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, APHG or VOO?

Over the past year APHG returned -13.16% vs +15.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), APHG annualized +81.60% vs +13.30% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, APHG or VOO?

APHG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than APHG?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. APHG led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.