APHG vs VXUS
Leverage Shares 2X Long APH Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, APHG or VXUS?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. APHG led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | APHG | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $296,272.14 | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 4 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -10.70% | +13.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.70% | +20.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -94.1% | -39.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 15.6 years | $6,442,710Best | $20,687 |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 15.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 28, 2011 to Sep 17, 2026 (15.6 years).
APHG vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
APHG vs VXUS Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long APH Daily ETF (APHG) is an ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year APHG returned -10.70% while VXUS returned +20.82%. Year to date, APHG is down 10.70% versus a gain of 13.64% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.1% for APHG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
APHG charges 0.99% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $5 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APHG currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in APHG and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 19.3% and 88.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in APHG and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 4 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of APHG and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, APHG or VXUS?
APHG has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, APHG or VXUS?
Over the past year APHG returned -10.70% vs +20.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), APHG annualized +51.38% vs +4.77% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, APHG or VXUS?
APHG yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than APHG?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. APHG led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.