APRT vs IVV
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Apr ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, APRT or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | APRT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $47M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.7%Best | 15.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0%Best | -24.5% |
| $10,000 over 5.5 years | $17,206 | $23,748Best |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 28, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 272 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. APRT has data through Dec 19, 2025 and IVV through Sep 17, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 5.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 1, 2020 to Dec 19, 2025 (5.5 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 9.7% for APRT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for APRT and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
APRT charges 0.74% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APRT currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of APRT and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, APRT or IVV?
APRT has an expense ratio of 0.74% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, APRT or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 9.7% for APRT. Worst drawdown: APRT -15.0% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both APRT and IVV?
APRT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, APRT or IVV?
APRT yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than APRT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.