APRT vs VTI
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Apr ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | APRT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $46M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.59% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.79% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.04% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.79% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 28, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
APRT vs VTI Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer10 Apr ETF (APRT) is a ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year APRT returned +7.79% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, APRT is up 7.59% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, APRT compounded at +15.04% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.79% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, APRT has the edge at +10.37% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 9.7% for APRT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for APRT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
APRT charges 0.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $74 vs $3 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, APRT currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, APRT or VTI?
APRT has an expense ratio of 0.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, APRT or VTI?
Over the past year APRT returned +7.79% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), APRT annualized +10.37% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, APRT or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 9.7% for APRT. Worst drawdown: APRT -15.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both APRT and VTI?
APRT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, APRT or VTI?
APRT yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.