ARKD vs VOO

ARKD vs VOO

Which is better, ARKD or VOO?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricARKDVOO
Expense Ratio0.89%0.03%Best
AUM$1M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings10509
YTD Return+4.47%+12.37%Best
1Y Return-64.14%+16.61%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.37%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.49%
Volatility (annualized)60.6%12.0%Best
Max Drawdown-72.1%-18.7%Best
$10,000 over 2.6 years$7,725$15,784Best
Fund FamilyArk InvestVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 2, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 7, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.6 years).

ARKD vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.

ARKD vs VOO Performance

ARK DIET Q1 Buffer ETF (ARKD) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARKD returned -64.14% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, ARKD is up 4.47% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ARKD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.6% compared with 12.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.1% for ARKD and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ARKD charges 0.89% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKD currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in ARKD and 494 in VOO, totalling 106.0% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in ARKD and 494 in VOO, against full books of 10 and 509.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ARKD and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ARKDVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ARKD or VOO?

ARKD has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ARKD or VOO?

Over the past year ARKD returned -64.14% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ARKD or VOO?

ARKD has been the more volatile fund at 60.6% annualized versus 12.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ARKD -72.1% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both ARKD and VOO?

ARKD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, ARKD or VOO?

ARKD yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than ARKD?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.