ARKG vs FNGG
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF vs Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF
Quick Verdict
ARKG has a lower expense ratio. ARKG delivered stronger 1-year returns. ARKG offers more diversification with 32 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKG | FNGG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.97% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $143M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 10.70% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 18 | |
| YTD Return | +70.90% | +33.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +101.74% | +33.40% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.45% | +61.59% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -9.98% | +4.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.1% | 58.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.6% | -91.3% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2014 | Sep 29, 2021 |
ARKG vs FNGG Performance
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year ARKG returned +101.74% while FNGG returned +33.40%. Year to date, ARKG is up 70.90% versus a gain of 33.72% for FNGG.
Over three years, ARKG compounded at +17.45% per year against +61.59% for FNGG; over five years the annualized figures are -9.98% and +4.44% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, ARKG has the edge at +8.97% annualized vs +4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.5% compared with 37.1% for ARKG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.6% for ARKG and -91.3% for FNGG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKG charges 0.75% per year while FNGG charges 0.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $97 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKG currently yields 0.00% against 10.70% for FNGG.
Holdings Overlap
ARKG and FNGG share 0 holdings out of 44 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKG or FNGG?
ARKG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while FNGG charges 0.97%. ARKG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARKG or FNGG?
Over the past year ARKG returned +101.74% vs +33.40% for FNGG, so ARKG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ARKG annualized +8.97% vs +4.44% for FNGG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARKG or FNGG?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.5% annualized versus 37.1% for ARKG. Worst drawdown: ARKG -83.6% vs FNGG -91.3%.
Should I hold both ARKG and FNGG?
ARKG and FNGG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKG and FNGG?
ARKG and FNGG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 44 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKG or FNGG?
ARKG yields 0.00% while FNGG yields 10.70%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.