ARKG vs PATN
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
PATN has a lower expense ratio. ARKG delivered stronger 1-year returns. PATN offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKG | PATN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $234M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.67% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +69.47% | +30.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +103.58% | +51.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.92% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -9.64% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.0% | 21.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.6% | -16.8% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | Pacer ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2014 | Sep 16, 2024 |
ARKG vs PATN Performance
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF (ARKG) is a ETF from Ark Invest and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year ARKG returned +103.58% while PATN returned +51.30%. Year to date, ARKG is up 69.47% versus a gain of 30.11% for PATN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.0% compared with 21.1% for PATN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.6% for ARKG and -16.8% for PATN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKG charges 0.75% per year while PATN charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $65 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKG currently yields 0.00% against 1.67% for PATN.
Holdings Overlap
ARKG and PATN share 0 holdings out of 132 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKG or PATN?
ARKG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while PATN charges 0.65%. PATN is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARKG or PATN?
Over the past year ARKG returned +103.58% vs +51.30% for PATN, so ARKG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ARKG annualized +8.90% vs +37.49% for PATN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARKG or PATN?
ARKG has been the more volatile fund at 37.0% annualized versus 21.1% for PATN. Worst drawdown: ARKG -83.6% vs PATN -16.8%.
Should I hold both ARKG and PATN?
ARKG and PATN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKG and PATN?
ARKG and PATN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 132 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKG or PATN?
ARKG yields 0.00% while PATN yields 1.67%, so PATN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.