ARMG vs IVV
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARMG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $55M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +246.01% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +98.16% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 177.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 14, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ARMG vs IVV Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARMG returned +98.16% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, ARMG is up 246.01% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 177.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.3% for ARMG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARMG charges 0.78% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARMG currently yields 0.70% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ARMG and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARMG or IVV?
ARMG has an expense ratio of 0.78% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARMG or IVV?
Over the past year ARMG returned +98.16% vs +22.02% for IVV, so ARMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ARMG annualized +26.67% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARMG or IVV?
ARMG has been the more volatile fund at 177.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ARMG -80.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ARMG and IVV?
ARMG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARMG and IVV?
ARMG and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARMG or IVV?
ARMG yields 0.70% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.