ARMG vs VTI
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARMG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARMG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $70M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.68% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +176.68% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +86.09% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 176.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Leverage Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 14, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
ARMG vs VTI Performance
Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) is a ETF from Leverage Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARMG returned +86.09% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, ARMG is up 176.68% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARMG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 176.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.3% for ARMG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARMG charges 0.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARMG currently yields 1.68% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ARMG and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARMG or VTI?
ARMG has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARMG or VTI?
Over the past year ARMG returned +86.09% vs +21.39% for VTI, so ARMG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ARMG annualized +9.80% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARMG or VTI?
ARMG has been the more volatile fund at 176.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ARMG -80.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ARMG and VTI?
ARMG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARMG and VTI?
ARMG and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARMG or VTI?
ARMG yields 1.68% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ARMG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.