ARMH vs IVV
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ARMH or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARMH led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARMH | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 15.43% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +139.96%Best | +12.39% |
| 1Y Return | +90.91%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 81.9% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -48.8% | -13.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $22,642Best | $13,771 |
| Fund Family | ADRH | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 13, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 14, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.5 years).
ARMH vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
ARMH vs IVV Performance
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged (ARMH) is an ETF from ADRH and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARMH returned +90.91% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, ARMH is up 139.96% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARMH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 81.9% compared with 12.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.8% for ARMH and -13.7% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARMH charges 0.19% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARMH currently yields 15.43% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in ARMH and 490 in IVV, totalling 99.8% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in ARMH and 490 in IVV, against full books of 2 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 2 and 490 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 482 positions ARMH does not, 98.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ARMH and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARMH or IVV?
ARMH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARMH or IVV?
Over the past year ARMH returned +90.91% vs +16.61% for IVV, so ARMH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ARMH annualized +72.43% vs +23.78% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARMH or IVV?
ARMH has been the more volatile fund at 81.9% annualized versus 12.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ARMH -48.8% vs IVV -13.7%.
Should I hold both ARMH and IVV?
ARMH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARMH or IVV?
ARMH yields 15.43% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ARMH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ARMH?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARMH led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.