ARMH vs IVV
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARMH delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARMH | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.28% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +115.13% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +90.17% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 84.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ADRH | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 13, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ARMH vs IVV Performance
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged (ARMH) is a ETF from ADRH and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARMH returned +90.17% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, ARMH is up 115.13% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARMH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 84.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.8% for ARMH and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARMH charges 0.19% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARMH currently yields 15.28% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ARMH and IVV share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARMH or IVV?
ARMH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARMH or IVV?
Over the past year ARMH returned +90.17% vs +20.94% for IVV, so ARMH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ARMH annualized +64.68% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARMH or IVV?
ARMH has been the more volatile fund at 84.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ARMH -48.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ARMH and IVV?
ARMH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARMH and IVV?
ARMH and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARMH or IVV?
ARMH yields 15.28% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ARMH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.