ARMH vs VTI
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARMH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARMH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.28% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +115.13% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +90.17% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 84.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ADRH | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 13, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
ARMH vs VTI Performance
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged (ARMH) is a ETF from ADRH and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARMH returned +90.17% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, ARMH is up 115.13% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARMH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 84.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.8% for ARMH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARMH charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARMH currently yields 15.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ARMH and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2789 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARMH or VTI?
ARMH has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARMH or VTI?
Over the past year ARMH returned +90.17% vs +21.39% for VTI, so ARMH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ARMH annualized +64.68% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARMH or VTI?
ARMH has been the more volatile fund at 84.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ARMH -48.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ARMH and VTI?
ARMH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARMH and VTI?
ARMH and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2789 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARMH or VTI?
ARMH yields 15.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ARMH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.