ASGM vs VOO
Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ASGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASGM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.86% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.87% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +21.02% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.58% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 4, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ASGM vs VOO Performance
Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASGM returned +32.58% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, ASGM is up 21.02% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.3% for ASGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.4% for ASGM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASGM charges 0.86% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $3 annually, a gap of $83 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASGM currently yields 3.87% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ASGM and VOO share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASGM or VOO?
ASGM has an expense ratio of 0.86% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $83 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASGM or VOO?
Over the past year ASGM returned +32.58% vs +20.92% for VOO, so ASGM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ASGM annualized +34.31% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASGM or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.3% for ASGM. Worst drawdown: ASGM -7.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ASGM and VOO?
ASGM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASGM and VOO?
ASGM and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASGM or VOO?
ASGM yields 3.87% while VOO yields 1.08%, so ASGM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.