ASGM vs VXUS
Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. ASGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASGM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.86% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $8M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.84% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.30% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.79% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -7.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Virtus Investment Partners | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 4, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
ASGM vs VXUS Performance
Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASGM returned +31.79% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, ASGM is up 18.30% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.2% for ASGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -7.4% for ASGM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASGM charges 0.86% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $86 vs $5 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASGM currently yields 3.84% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
ASGM and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7864 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASGM or VXUS?
ASGM has an expense ratio of 0.86% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASGM or VXUS?
Over the past year ASGM returned +31.79% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so ASGM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ASGM annualized +32.69% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASGM or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.2% for ASGM. Worst drawdown: ASGM -7.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both ASGM and VXUS?
ASGM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ASGM and VXUS?
ASGM and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7864 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASGM or VXUS?
ASGM yields 3.84% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so ASGM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.