ASHS vs SCHD
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ASHS delivered stronger 1-year returns. ASHS offers more diversification with 495 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASHS | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $35M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 495 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +11.33% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.52% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.10% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.52% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.9% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 21, 2014 | Oct 20, 2011 |
ASHS vs SCHD Performance
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ASHS returned +35.52% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, ASHS is up 11.33% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, ASHS compounded at +15.10% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +2.52% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs +5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASHS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.9% for ASHS and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASHS charges 0.65% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $6 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASHS currently yields 0.00% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
ASHS and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 590 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASHS or SCHD?
ASHS has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASHS or SCHD?
Over the past year ASHS returned +35.52% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so ASHS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), ASHS annualized +5.74% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASHS or SCHD?
ASHS has been the more volatile fund at 27.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: ASHS -69.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both ASHS and SCHD?
ASHS and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASHS and SCHD?
ASHS and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 590 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASHS or SCHD?
ASHS yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.