ASHS vs VOO
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ASHS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASHS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $35M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 495 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +8.66% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.01% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.01% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.42% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 21, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ASHS vs VOO Performance
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASHS returned +28.01% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, ASHS is up 8.66% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, ASHS compounded at +15.01% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.42% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASHS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.9% for ASHS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASHS charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASHS currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ASHS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 995 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASHS or VOO?
ASHS has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASHS or VOO?
Over the past year ASHS returned +28.01% vs +21.62% for VOO, so ASHS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), ASHS annualized +5.53% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASHS or VOO?
ASHS has been the more volatile fund at 27.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ASHS -69.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ASHS and VOO?
ASHS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASHS and VOO?
ASHS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 995 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASHS or VOO?
ASHS yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.