ASHS vs IVV
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ASHS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASHS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $35M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 495 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.33% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.52% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.10% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.52% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 21, 2014 | May 15, 2000 |
ASHS vs IVV Performance
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ASHS returned +35.52% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, ASHS is up 11.33% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, ASHS compounded at +15.10% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +2.52% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ASHS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.9% for ASHS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASHS charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASHS currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ASHS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 995 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASHS or IVV?
ASHS has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASHS or IVV?
Over the past year ASHS returned +35.52% vs +21.79% for IVV, so ASHS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), ASHS annualized +5.74% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASHS or IVV?
ASHS has been the more volatile fund at 27.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ASHS -69.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ASHS and IVV?
ASHS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASHS and IVV?
ASHS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 995 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASHS or IVV?
ASHS yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.