ASTM vs IVV
Allspring Strategic Municipal Bond Fund ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ASTM or IVV?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASTM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.9B | $879.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 887 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +1.13% | +11.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +13.50% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.45% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.61% |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 21, 1985 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ASTM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ASTM vs IVV Performance
Allspring Strategic Municipal Bond Fund ETF (ASTM) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, ASTM is up 1.13% versus a gain of 11.33% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASTM charges 0.42% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASTM currently yields 0.01% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 142 holdings in ASTM and 490 in IVV, totalling 30.3% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 142 positions we hold weights for in ASTM and 490 in IVV, against full books of 887 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASTM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASTM or IVV?
ASTM has an expense ratio of 0.42% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $39 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASTM or IVV?
ASTM yields 0.01% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ASTM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.