ASTM vs QQQ
Allspring Strategic Municipal Bond Fund ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, ASTM or QQQ?
Municipal Bond against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASTM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $1.9B | $476.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 887 | 312 |
| YTD Return | +1.13% | +11.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +12.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 21, 1985 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ASTM vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ASTM vs QQQ Performance
Allspring Strategic Municipal Bond Fund ETF (ASTM) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ASTM is up 1.13% versus a gain of 11.27% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASTM charges 0.42% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $18 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASTM currently yields 0.01% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 142 holdings in ASTM and 101 in QQQ, totalling 30.3% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 142 positions we hold weights for in ASTM and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 887 and 312.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASTM and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASTM or QQQ?
ASTM has an expense ratio of 0.42% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASTM or QQQ?
ASTM yields 0.01% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than ASTM?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.