ATFV vs VYM

ATFV vs VYM

Which is better, ATFV or VYM?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricATFVVYM
Expense Ratio0.56%0.04%Best
AUM$443M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.18%2.22%
Holdings34613
YTD Return+17.42%Best+10.96%
1Y Return+15.37%+15.42%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+42.60%Best+17.78%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.53%Best+12.05%
Volatility (annualized)24.0%13.5%Best
Max Drawdown-45.3%-15.8%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$18,860Best$17,663
Top 10 Weight57.0%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyAlgerVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionMay 4, 2021Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 4, 2021 to Sep 22, 2026 (5.4 years).

ATFV vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.4 years both funds cover.

ATFV vs VYM Performance

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ATFV returned +15.37% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, ATFV is up 17.42% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.

Over three years, ATFV compounded at +42.60% per year against +17.78% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.53% and +12.05% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 13.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.3% for ATFV and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ATFV charges 0.56% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $4 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.18% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

ATFV already in VYM8.5%
VYM already in ATFV9.8%

8.5% of ATFV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.8% of VYM's money is in holdings ATFV also owns.

VYM and ATFV share little of their money.

4 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ATFV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 34 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 524 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for ATFV (87.2% of the fund), and 25 for ATFV that do not appear in VYM (85.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ATFVWeight in VYMDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.68%7.35%4.67%
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.02%1.31%0.71%
GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The1.89%1.13%0.76%
MTCHMatch Group Inc1.92%0.04%1.88%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ATFV and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ATFVVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ATFV or VYM?

ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ATFV or VYM?

Over the past year ATFV returned +15.37% vs +15.42% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ATFV or VYM?

ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 13.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ATFV -45.3% vs VYM -15.8%.

Should I hold both ATFV and VYM?

ATFV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between ATFV and VYM?

9.8% of VYM's money is in holdings ATFV also owns. 9.8% of VYM's is in holdings ATFV also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in ATFV and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or VYM?

ATFV yields 0.18% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than ATFV?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.