ATFV vs VTI
Alger 35 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ATFV or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $487M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 36 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +15.05%Best | +14.43% |
| 1Y Return | +12.98% | +18.05%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.66%Best | +22.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.98%Best | +12.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.3% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,237Best | $18,213 |
| Fund Family | Alger | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 4, 2021 to Oct 12, 2026 (5.4 years).
ATFV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.4 years both funds cover.
ATFV vs VTI Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is an ETF from Alger and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ATFV returned +12.98% while VTI returned +18.05%. Year to date, ATFV is up 15.05% versus a gain of 14.43% for VTI.
Over three years, ATFV compounded at +40.66% per year against +22.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.98% and +12.74% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 15.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.3% for ATFV and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.18% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ATFV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or VTI?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ATFV or VTI?
Over the past year ATFV returned +12.98% vs +18.05% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ATFV or VTI?
ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 15.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ATFV -45.3% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both ATFV and VTI?
ATFV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or VTI?
ATFV yields 0.18% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ATFV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ATFV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.