ATFV vs VTI
Alger 35 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ATFV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ATFV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $248M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.19% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.87% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.48% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.77% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.34% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -45.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Alger | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 4, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
ATFV vs VTI Performance
Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is a ETF from Alger and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ATFV returned +25.48% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, ATFV is up 11.87% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, ATFV compounded at +38.77% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, ATFV has the edge at +14.12% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ATFV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.3% for ATFV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ATFV charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ATFV currently yields 0.19% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ATFV and VTI share 22 holdings out of 2797 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ATFV or VTI?
ATFV has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ATFV or VTI?
Over the past year ATFV returned +25.48% vs +21.39% for VTI, so ATFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), ATFV annualized +14.12% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ATFV or VTI?
ATFV has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ATFV -45.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ATFV and VTI?
ATFV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ATFV and VTI?
ATFV and VTI share 22 common holdings with a 21.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2797 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ATFV or VTI?
ATFV yields 0.19% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.