AVSF vs IVV
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVSF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $652M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.37% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 501 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.02% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.33% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.84% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
AVSF vs IVV Performance
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AVSF returned +4.33% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, AVSF is up 1.02% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, AVSF compounded at +2.84% per year against +21.81% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +0.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.9% for AVSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.8% for AVSF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVSF charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVSF currently yields 4.37% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVSF or IVV?
AVSF has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVSF or IVV?
Over the past year AVSF returned +4.33% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), AVSF annualized +0.78% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVSF or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.9% for AVSF. Worst drawdown: AVSF -8.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AVSF and IVV?
AVSF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVSF and IVV?
AVSF and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 969 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVSF or IVV?
AVSF yields 4.37% while IVV yields 1.10%, so AVSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.