AVSF vs VOO
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AVSF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $653M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.35% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 496 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.02% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.33% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.84% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Avantis Investors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
AVSF vs VOO Performance
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF) is a ETF from Avantis Investors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AVSF returned +4.33% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, AVSF is up 1.02% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, AVSF compounded at +2.84% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +0.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 2.9% for AVSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.8% for AVSF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AVSF charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AVSF currently yields 4.35% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
AVSF and VOO share 1 holdings out of 970 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AVSF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AVSF or VOO?
AVSF has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AVSF or VOO?
Over the past year AVSF returned +4.33% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), AVSF annualized +0.78% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AVSF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 2.9% for AVSF. Worst drawdown: AVSF -8.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both AVSF and VOO?
AVSF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AVSF and VOO?
AVSF and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 970 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AVSF or VOO?
AVSF yields 4.35% while VOO yields 1.09%, so AVSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.