BAMU vs SCHD
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMU | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $67M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.02% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +0.78% | +25.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.14% | +32.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.63% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BAMU vs SCHD Performance
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BAMU returned +2.14% while SCHD returned +32.62%. Year to date, BAMU is up 0.78% versus a gain of 25.62% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 0.5% for BAMU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.7% for BAMU and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMU charges 1.05% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $6 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMU currently yields 3.02% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
BAMU and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMU or SCHD?
BAMU has an expense ratio of 1.05% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMU or SCHD?
Over the past year BAMU returned +2.14% vs +32.62% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMU annualized +3.28% vs +11.47% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMU or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 0.5% for BAMU. Worst drawdown: BAMU -0.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BAMU and SCHD?
BAMU and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMU and SCHD?
BAMU and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMU or SCHD?
BAMU yields 3.02% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.