BAMU vs VTI
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BAMU or VTI?
Ultrashort Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $66M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.89% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +0.40% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.31% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.03% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.7%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.7%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $10,937 | $18,477Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3 years).
BAMU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BAMU vs VTI Performance
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) is an ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMU returned +1.31% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, BAMU is up 0.40% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, BAMU compounded at +3.03% per year against +21.01% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 0.7% for BAMU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.7% for BAMU and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.00. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMU charges 1.05% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMU currently yields 2.89% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 5 holdings in BAMU and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 98.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in BAMU and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 7 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BAMU (97.5% of the fund), and 4 for BAMU that do not appear in VTI (79.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BAMU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMU or VTI?
BAMU has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $102 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BAMU or VTI?
Over the past year BAMU returned +1.31% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BAMU or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 0.7% for BAMU. Worst drawdown: BAMU -0.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both BAMU and VTI?
BAMU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.00, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMU or VTI?
BAMU yields 2.89% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BAMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BAMU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.