BAMU vs VOO
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $67M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.02% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.84% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.19% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 0.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 27, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BAMU vs VOO Performance
Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BAMU returned +2.19% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, BAMU is up 0.84% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 0.5% for BAMU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.7% for BAMU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMU charges 1.05% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $3 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMU currently yields 3.02% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BAMU and VOO share 0 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMU or VOO?
BAMU has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMU or VOO?
Over the past year BAMU returned +2.19% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMU annualized +3.30% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMU or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 0.5% for BAMU. Worst drawdown: BAMU -0.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BAMU and VOO?
BAMU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMU and VOO?
BAMU and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMU or VOO?
BAMU yields 3.02% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BAMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.