BAMY vs IVV
Brookstone Yield ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMY | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.46% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $44M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.97% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.45% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.81% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BAMY vs IVV Performance
Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BAMY returned +5.81% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, BAMY is up 0.45% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.8% for BAMY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.0% for BAMY and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMY charges 1.46% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $146 vs $3 annually, a gap of $143 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMY currently yields 6.97% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BAMY and IVV share 0 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMY or IVV?
BAMY has an expense ratio of 1.46% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $143 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMY or IVV?
Over the past year BAMY returned +5.81% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMY annualized +10.16% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMY or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.8% for BAMY. Worst drawdown: BAMY -6.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BAMY and IVV?
BAMY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMY and IVV?
BAMY and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMY or IVV?
BAMY yields 6.97% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BAMY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.