BAMY vs QQQ
Brookstone Yield ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BAMY | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.46% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $44M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.98% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.39% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.15% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.05% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -6.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Brookstone Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 28, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BAMY vs QQQ Performance
Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) is a ETF from Brookstone Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BAMY returned +6.15% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, BAMY is up 0.39% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, BAMY compounded at +10.05% per year against +25.75% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 4.8% for BAMY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.0% for BAMY and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BAMY charges 1.46% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $146 vs $18 annually, a gap of $128 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BAMY currently yields 6.98% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BAMY and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BAMY or QQQ?
BAMY has an expense ratio of 1.46% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $128 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BAMY or QQQ?
Over the past year BAMY returned +6.15% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BAMY annualized +10.05% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BAMY or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 4.8% for BAMY. Worst drawdown: BAMY -6.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BAMY and QQQ?
BAMY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BAMY and QQQ?
BAMY and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BAMY or QQQ?
BAMY yields 6.98% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BAMY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.