BATT vs VYM
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BATT or VYM?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BATT led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BATT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $129M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.77% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 54 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +11.35% | +15.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +43.92%Best | +22.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.30% | +18.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.16% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -69.4% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,920 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.4% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 6, 2018 to Sep 3, 2026 (8.2 years).
BATT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.2 years both funds cover.
BATT vs VYM Performance
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BATT returned +43.92% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, BATT is up 11.35% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.
Over three years, BATT compounded at +10.30% per year against +18.81% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.16% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +10.40% annualized vs -1.23%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BATT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.4% for BATT and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BATT charges 0.59% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $4 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BATT currently yields 1.77% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
1.5% of BATT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings BATT also owns.
BATT and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in BATT and 603 in VYM, against full books of 54 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 569 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BATT (97.3% of the fund), and 9 for BATT that do not appear in VYM (22.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BATT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALBAlbemarle Corp. | 1.47% | 0.07% | 1.40% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BATT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BATT or VYM?
BATT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BATT or VYM?
Over the past year BATT returned +43.92% vs +22.23% for VYM, so BATT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BATT annualized -1.23% vs +10.40% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BATT or VYM?
BATT has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BATT -69.4% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both BATT and VYM?
BATT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BATT and VYM?
1.5% of BATT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's is in holdings BATT also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in BATT and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BATT or VYM?
BATT yields 1.77% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BATT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BATT led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.