BBAX vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBAX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.6B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.59% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.91% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.37% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.49% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
BBAX vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBAX returned +18.91% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, BBAX is up 14.29% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, BBAX compounded at +15.37% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.49% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBAX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.6% for BBAX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBAX charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBAX currently yields 3.59% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BBAX and VTI share 2 holdings out of 2876 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBAX or VTI?
BBAX has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBAX or VTI?
Over the past year BBAX returned +18.91% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBAX annualized +6.08% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBAX or VTI?
BBAX has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBAX -39.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BBAX and VTI?
BBAX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBAX and VTI?
BBAX and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2876 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBAX or VTI?
BBAX yields 3.59% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BBAX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.