BBAX vs VXUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, BBAX or VXUS?
VXUS has been ahead.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBAX | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $6.8B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.46% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 102 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +12.82% | +14.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.57% | +22.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | +20.00%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.53% | +8.91%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.6% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,720 | $15,323Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 8, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (8.1 years).
BBAX vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.1 years both funds cover.
BBAX vs VXUS Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBAX returned +13.57% while VXUS returned +22.28%. Year to date, BBAX is up 12.82% versus a gain of 14.48% for VXUS.
Over three years, BBAX compounded at +15.42% per year against +20.00% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.53% and +8.91% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +8.05% annualized vs +5.84%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBAX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 16.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.6% for BBAX and -35.1% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBAX charges 0.19% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $5 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBAX currently yields 3.46% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 76.9% of BBAX's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of BBAX is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
61 positions in common, counted across the 91 positions we hold weights for in BBAX and 8,091 in VXUS, against full books of 102 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBAX | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHP:AUBhp Group Ltd Sedol 6144690 | 9.95% | 0.30% | 9.65% |
| CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank Of Australia | 9.16% | 0.42% | 8.74% |
| DBSM:SIDBS Group Holdings Ltd Dbs Group Holdings Ltd | 5.29% | 0.23% | 5.06% |
| 1299:HKAia Group Ltd | 4.34% | 0.21% | 4.13% |
| NAB:AUNational Australia Bank Limited | 3.97% | 0.18% | 3.79% |
| ANZ:AUAustralia New Zealand Banking Group | 3.48% | 0.16% | 3.32% |
| WES:AUWesfarmers Ltd | 3.15% | 0.16% | 2.99% |
| MQG:AUMacquarie Bank Ltd. | 2.96% | 0.13% | 2.83% |
| 0388:HKHong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited Shs | 2.73% | 0.12% | 2.61% |
| RIO:LNRio Tinto Plc Ord Gbp.10 | 2.04% | 0.22% | 1.82% |
76.9% of BBAX is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBAX or VXUS?
BBAX has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBAX or VXUS?
Over the past year BBAX returned +13.57% vs +22.28% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBAX annualized +5.84% vs +8.05% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBAX or VXUS?
BBAX has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 16.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BBAX -39.6% vs VXUS -35.1%.
Should I hold both BBAX and VXUS?
BBAX and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBAX and VXUS?
At least 76.9% of BBAX's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 61 positions in common, counted across the 91 positions we hold weights for in BBAX and 8,091 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBAX or VXUS?
BBAX yields 3.46% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so BBAX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than BBAX?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.