BBAX vs VYM
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBAX | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $6.6B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.59% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +15.63% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.53% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.24% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.91% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BBAX vs VYM Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBAX returned +20.53% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, BBAX is up 15.63% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, BBAX compounded at +15.24% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +6.91% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +6.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBAX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.6% for BBAX and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBAX charges 0.19% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $4 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBAX currently yields 3.59% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBAX or VYM?
BBAX has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBAX or VYM?
Over the past year BBAX returned +20.53% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBAX annualized +6.24% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBAX or VYM?
BBAX has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BBAX -39.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BBAX and VYM?
BBAX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBAX and VYM?
BBAX and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 651 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBAX or VYM?
BBAX yields 3.59% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BBAX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.